🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass gatherings where Black people are compensated to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to scrub Black history and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be comforted with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.