🔗 Share this article

For months, intimidating messages recurred. Initially, allegedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, and then from the authorities. Finally, a local artisan claims he was called to the local precinct and instructed bluntly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

The leather artisan is part of a group opposing a high-value initiative where one of India's largest slums – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – faces bulldozed and redeveloped by a multinational conglomerate.

"The distinctive community of the slum is like nowhere else in the world," says the protester. "However their intention is to destroy our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of Dharavi present a dramatic difference to the high-rise structures and elite residences that overshadow the neighborhood. Dwellings are constructed informally and frequently missing basic amenities, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is filled with the suffocating smell of uncovered waste channels.

For certain residents, the prospect of Dharavi transformed into a glistening neighborhood of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, shiny shopping centers and residences with two toilets is a hopeful vision come true.

"We don't have sufficient health services, paved pathways or water management and there are no spaces for youth to recreate," states a tea vendor, fifty-six, who migrated from his home state in 1982. "The single option is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Resident Opposition

Yet certain residents, such as Shaikh, are fighting against the plan.

None deny that this community, historically ignored as informal housing, is urgently needing investment and development. Yet they are concerned that this plan – absent of public consultation – is one that will transform valuable urban land into a luxury development, displacing the lower-caste, migrant communities who have been there since the nineteenth century.

These were these excluded, relocated individuals who developed the uninhabited area into a widely studied marvel of self-reliance and commercial output, whose economic value is worth between a significant amount and $2m per year, making it among the globe's biggest unregulated sectors.

Relocation Worries

Out of about one million residents living in the packed sprawling neighborhood, fewer than half will be able for replacement housing in the development, which is expected to take a significant period to accomplish. Others will be relocated to undeveloped zones and coastal regions on the remote edges of the metropolis, risking divide a generations-old social network. Certain individuals will receive no housing at all.

People eligible to continue living in Dharavi will be allocated apartments in tower blocks, a substantial change from the organic, collective approach of residing and operating that has sustained Dharavi for generations.

Commercial activities from tailoring to ceramic crafts and recycling are expected to reduce in scale and be transferred to an allocated "industrial sector" separated from residential areas.

Existential Threat

For residents like Shaikh, a workshop owner and long-time of his family to live in Dharavi, the plan presents an existential threat. His rickety, three-floor facility creates apparel – tailored coats, luxury coats, studded bomber jackets – distributed in luxury boutiques in south Mumbai and abroad.

Household members resides in the rooms below and employees and garment workers – workers from different regions – also sleep there, enabling him to sustain operations. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, accommodation prices are frequently 10 times more expensive for minimal space.

Threats and Warning

Within the official facilities close by, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project depicts a contrasting perspective. Slickly dressed inhabitants move around on cycles and e-vehicles, buying continental baked goods and breakfast items and enlisting beverages on a terrace outside a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. This depicts a stark contrast from the 20-rupee idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that sustains Dharavi's community.

"This isn't development for our community," says Shaikh. "It's a huge land development that will make it unaffordable for us to survive."

Furthermore, there's concern of the business conglomerate. Run by an influential industrialist – a leading figure and a close ally of the government head – the business group has been subject to claims of preferential treatment and ethical concerns, which it denies.

Even as the state government describes it as a partnership, the business group invested nearly a billion dollars for its 80% stake. A case stating that the initiative was improperly granted to the business group is pending in the nation's highest judicial body.

Continued Intimidation

From when they initiated to actively protest the project, local opponents state they have been experienced a long-running campaign of coercion and warning – involving communications, explicit warnings and implications that criticizing the project was comparable with opposing national interests – by figures they claim are associated with the business conglomerate.

Among those suspected of making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c